Sunday, March 22, 2020
The life of Rosalinda Franklin Essays - Biology,
  The life of Rosalinda Franklin        Rosalinda Franklin was a British chemist best known for her role in the discovery of the structure of DNA, and for her pioneering use of X-ray   diffraction.   She   was born in 1920 in London, England. She earned a Ph.D. in physical chemistry from Cambridge University. She learned crystallography and X-ray diffraction, and applied these techniques to discover DNA fibers. Her photographs provided key insights into DNA structure. Many scientists used her photographs as evidence to support their DNA model and took credit for the discovery.             Unfortunately Franklin died of ovarian cancer in 1958, at age 37.      Rosalind Elsie Franklin was born into an influential Jewish family on July 25, 1920, in   Notting   Hill, London, England. She displayed exceptional intelligence from early childhood;   she started to show passion for science at an early age of fifteen. Franklin wanted   to be a scientist. She received her education at several schools, including North London Collegiate School, where she excelled in science, among other things.   She   enrolled at   Newnham   College, Cambridge, in 1938 and studied chemistry. In 1941, she was awarded Sec   ond Class Honors in her finals. Her award   was accepted as a bachelor's degree in the qualifications for employment. She went on to work as an assistant research officer at the British Coal   Utilisation   Research Association, where she studied the porosity of coalwork that was the basis of her 1945 Ph.D.   She studied t   he physical chemistry of solid organic colloids      with special reference to coal.   In 1946, Franklin was appointed at the   Laboratoire   Central des Servic   es   Chimiques   de   l'Etat   in Paris.             S   he worked with crystallographer Jacques   Mering   . He taught her X-ray diffraction, which   played   an   important role in her research that led to the discovery of the structure   of DNA. In addition,   Franklin   used   X-rays to create image   s of   crystalized   solids in identifying   inorgani   c   matter, not just single crystals.      In January 1951,   she   began working as a research associate at the King's College London in the biophysics unit,   with   director   John   Randall.             She   used her expertise and X-ray diffraction techniques   to examine   DNA fibers.    She   s   tud   ied   DNA   structure with X-ray diffraction,   and   made an amazing discovery      with   her student Raymond Gosling   .    They took pictures of DNA and discovered that there were two forms of it   .    One of their X-ray diffraction pictures   of the "B" form of DNA (   Photograph 51   )   became famous as critical evidence in identifying the structure of DNA. The photo was acquired through 100 hours of X-ray exposure from a machine Franklin   refined.             Franklin was known for her   cautious   and diligent work ethic,   but she was also known   for   her      conflict   with colleague Maurice Wilkins,    a conflict which ended up   costing her   dearly   . In January 1953, Wilkins changed the course of DNA history by disclosing without Franklin's permission or knowledge her Photo 51 to competing scientist James Watson, who was working on his own DNA model with Francis Crick at Cambridge.      The two scientists did in fact use   Franklin's   Photo   51 as the basis for   their   now      famous model of DNA   . They   published   it      on March 7, 1953, and received a Nobel Prize in 1962. Crick and Watson were also able to take most of the credit for the finding   .      M   uch of their work   however   was   based on   Franklin's photo   s   and findings.             Unfortunately,   Franklin didn't know that these men based their   Nature      article on her research, and she didn't complain either   .   Franklin left King's College in March 1953 and relocated to   Birkbeck   College, where she studied the structure of the tobacco mosaic virus and the structure of RNA. Because Randall let Franklin leave on the condition that she would not work on DNA, she turned her attention back to studies of coal. In five years, Franklin published 17 papers on viruses, and her group laid the foundations for structural virology.      In the fall of 1956, Franklin discovered that she had ovarian cancer.       She continued working   for   two years, despite   her illness. She received an experimental chemotherapy treatment and   experienced a 10-month remission and worked up until several weeks before her death on April 16, 1958, at the age    
Thursday, March 5, 2020
Free Essays on Abortion- Pro Choice, Only Choice
Abortion has always been a controversial subject among everybody whether they are involved directly or indirectly, whether they are for it or against it. It is nearly impossible to find someone who doesnââ¬â¢t have an opinion about abortion. Both those who favor or oppose abortion make superior arguments to defend their beliefs and views.   Personally, I think every last person is entitled to his or her own opinions, beliefs, thoughts, and rights. And yes, women have rights too, and denying women the right to choose abortion in the early stages of fetal development is denying her rights as a US citizen and is also discriminating against her. I think that abortion should be restricted to the first 21 weeks, which is when most of the tests can be taken to determine the health of the fetus. Anything after that might be immoral, since the fetus can very well live outside the motherââ¬â¢s womb; although, it does depend on the situation.   Abortion should unquestionably not be used as a primary birth control use. It should be determined based on the circumstances of the pregnancy. A woman should have the choice to have an abortion if she is raped, impregnated by a disturbed man or by incest. It would be unfair to force a rape victim to bear an unwanted baby and give up all the dreams she ever had and be reminded of that rape for the rest of her life.   I also think a womanââ¬â¢s life should not be sacrificed or put at risk, a woman should be able to abort if there is any complications or a risk to her life and a threat to the babyââ¬â¢s life. It would be morally wrong to bring to this world a severely deformed, extremely handicapped, or an incompetent baby and watch him or her suffer for the rest of their lives. That would not only affect the motherââ¬â¢s life, but that would affect the babyââ¬â¢s life also. That child would never be average, never be happy and would feel dejected for not being like the other children. It takes so much energy, will power...  Free Essays on Abortion- Pro Choice, Only Choice  Free Essays on Abortion- Pro Choice, Only Choice    Abortion has always been a controversial subject among everybody whether they are involved directly or indirectly, whether they are for it or against it. It is nearly impossible to find someone who doesnââ¬â¢t have an opinion about abortion. Both those who favor or oppose abortion make superior arguments to defend their beliefs and views.   Personally, I think every last person is entitled to his or her own opinions, beliefs, thoughts, and rights. And yes, women have rights too, and denying women the right to choose abortion in the early stages of fetal development is denying her rights as a US citizen and is also discriminating against her. I think that abortion should be restricted to the first 21 weeks, which is when most of the tests can be taken to determine the health of the fetus. Anything after that might be immoral, since the fetus can very well live outside the motherââ¬â¢s womb; although, it does depend on the situation.   Abortion should unquestionably not be used as a primary birth control use. It should be determined based on the circumstances of the pregnancy. A woman should have the choice to have an abortion if she is raped, impregnated by a disturbed man or by incest. It would be unfair to force a rape victim to bear an unwanted baby and give up all the dreams she ever had and be reminded of that rape for the rest of her life.   I also think a womanââ¬â¢s life should not be sacrificed or put at risk, a woman should be able to abort if there is any complications or a risk to her life and a threat to the babyââ¬â¢s life. It would be morally wrong to bring to this world a severely deformed, extremely handicapped, or an incompetent baby and watch him or her suffer for the rest of their lives. That would not only affect the motherââ¬â¢s life, but that would affect the babyââ¬â¢s life also. That child would never be average, never be happy and would feel dejected for not being like the other children. It takes so much energy, will power...    
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
